Well, the week has flown by, I didn’t even get to post a Monday Moaning this week. Sorry about that, I do like to start the week off with a moan.
Last weeks CTWW post, almost had me convinced. I had previously been dead set against CFLs in the past, but I do try so hard to be a little greenish in my life, and I decided to cast my reservations to the wind and begin a slow replacement of the incandescent light bulbs, one as a trial, then others as they burn out.
But then I had a comment from a reader that jerked me back to reality and the myriad of reasons why CFLs should be avoided at all costs, you can read about that on Rather Frightening.
Here’s a quick demonstration that shows you that there is something definitely not right with CFLs.
Look at the two reflected spectra on the CD surface. The right is an incandescent light source, the left, a CFL.
Notice how the CFL has three ‘hot spots’ at the extremes of the spectrum. Ultra-violet and infra red. I am not an expert, but here’s the story from q-re-s.com, read it, it explains why the light from CFLs will never equal the light from incandescents.
Looks like we don’t yet have all the answers, and have shown that by flying off half cocked with CFLs. You know what? I can see the writing on the wall. It won’t be too far in the future when CFLs are banned (Germany has already legislated against CFLs in certain applications) and we have to replace with solution of the moment, be it LEDs or OLEDS or Super Dooper Non-carbon emmitting candles. Guess who gets to benefit? If you guessed you, then you are dead wrong… once again the corporations will reap their ill-gotten gains at your expense and gullibility.
Well, that got a bit long-winded…
This week’s Change the World Wednesday:
If you don’t have a pet, suggest ways that we can protect wild animals.
Will have to wait. It’s 3:30am, and I am going back to bed…
Up again, got coffee.
At the moment I don’t have a pet. My last two, Meow Meow and da Meow were poisoned here in the praça (park) where I live.
How do you make a pet eco-friendly?
Well, I guess the major problem with pets is poop. Both used my compost heap. I used to put a small square of sand (collected from the street) next to the compost and when it got too soiled, I just turned it into the compost and got more sand. A few years ago when I had Pexote and Pivete, our two dogs, their poop was scooped off the lawn and straight into the compost.
Okay, that deals with what comes out, but what about what goes in?
I don’t buy (or didn’t) dry pet food, nor the canned stuff. I stopped that when I read about how they manufacture it and how the corporations control what advice your vet gives about such products. The vets say it’s good for your pet because the corporations dictate (by way of donations and funding) what the universities teach them to say.
The story I read of one vet who rebelled against pet food after having one of the dogs under his care become an epileptic, losing it’s fur, etc. He changed the dog to a diet of raw bones, yup, just raw bones and within two weeks the epileptic fits had stopped and the dog’s coat had begun to shine. He was working on the basis that that’s what dogs ate before humans started messing with their dietary needs. Since then all the animals he sees, he recommends a change back to raw bones and meat. The owners report that their pets become different animals, more active, healthier growth, lose their bad breath and fat ones lose weight and look like dogs instead of barrels on legs.

If your pet food comes like this, go and talk to your butcher about bones
I just put “processed pet food is bad” into Google hoping I could find the story, but it produced such a plethora of results, there wasn’t a hope of finding that particular one. You do it and have a browse. The first page of results has NOTHING good to say about processed pet food.
Another aspect of pets, fleas and such. When I had the cats, I couldn’t afford fancy flea powders at R$10 (about $7) a throw, I used a little sodium bicarb, rubbed that in and the fleas decided my cats weren’t such a good host.
I never used detergents or soaps or shampoos with my animals, just the garden hose and a good rub both for cats and dogs.
That’s about it, I guess. Not much, but I am interested to see what others have to say.
Good challenge.
.
Posted by smallftprints on October 19, 2011 at 10:00 pm
Well, I guess the debate on CFLs goes on. I personally don’t have a problem with them. In terms of mercury, there isn’t much … in fact, it is less than many common household products and while incandescent bulbs don’t contain mercury, it takes a substantial amount of mercury to make them. As for the UV rays … incandescent bulbs also emit UV rays (very small amount) and CFLs not much more. Probably, by the time the debate is conclusive, LEDs will be affordable … and that will be my choice.
It’s going to be interesting to see what everyone comes up with for pets. 🙂
LikeLike
Posted by argentumvulgaris on October 20, 2011 at 4:13 pm
@SF, sorry, wasn’t ignoring you, just thinking. I am planning a post dealing with all the sources of mercury in our lives, hopefully it will be up tomorrow. All light sources emit UV as a part of the spectrum, but it’s the concentration that worries in CFLs. Not sure where you get the idea that mercury is used in the manufacture of incandescents… unless you are thinking of coal powered electric plants, they shunt mercury into the atmosphere like crazy. Read Fink on Friday tomorrow.
Thanks for the comment.
AV
LikeLike