Water has often been the subject on CTWW, it is a valuable commodity, one that we need to survive; without water any man, community or country has three days before they are dead. That makes it a tad more than important.
The first world take it for granted, you turn on the tap and cool clear water comes out; right?
Well, I have always subscribed to this theory, and even though I have spent the last 22 years in third world countries that has generally been true in urban areas aslo.
Not funny. In fact, it’s enought to give you the shits.
Both bouts stretched over eight days, with terrible cramps and diarrhea.
The common denominator, drinking tap water from my kitchen tap. There is obviously a problem with my roof tank that I have to get seen to.
Now I am pretty ‘water conscious’. I conserve water (three-minute showers, etc), I save water (rain), I reuse water (grey water).
I drink sparkling mineral water in place of soft drinks (soda) and commercial fruit juice. I won’t have them in the house because they pure poison and one of the greatest causes of obesity. Here’s a thought, did you know that Zero Coke is more fattening that normal Coke?
To combat this problem, I have had to restort to buying my water. I hate the thought of buying a comodity that should be free.
I have always been against buying water, unless it is sparkling mineral water.
But recently, with my own experience of swtiching to sparkling mineral water, I have begun to wonder that water may well be a healthier buy than soft drinks full of poison.
I am buying 20 litre carrafes that are returnable, rather than single serve or 1.5 litre bottles. So even with my current dire needs, I am looking out for what is best for the planet.
Hopefully, I can resolve this problem in short time.
I am, however, totally against water being bottled, trucked, shipped and flown from far flung places around the globe like Fiji Islands to satisfy the need for consumer sales.
“The natural artesian water from FIJI Water comes to you straight from the isolated and idyllic Fiji Islands without ever being touched by man.” – advertising blurb.
This commerce needs to be banned. It is an abomination. Especially when you know that Fijians from Viti Levu (the second largest of the Fiji Is) are denied this water for themselves. The source for this water is guarded by barbed wire and heavy security.
A note for Americans… Obama drinks it. So where is his commitment to water?
Now the good news. Since I have switched from soft drinks to sparkling mineral water, I have dropped 15kgs (30lbs +/-), two jeans sizes and added two new holes to my belt. So if you are serious about losing weight, stop drinking soda and commercial fruit juice!
This week’s CTWW is a
stinker thinker, Population.
This week, let’s open up the discussion on population as it affects the environment. Please leave a comment and/or write a post about your feelings on the topic. You might discuss if, in your opinion, our growing population is a concern. Perhaps talk about such things as the earth’s ability to support growing numbers of people, or if the number of children we have should be regulated (and if so, by whom). While religious considerations are often a factor in a person’s decision to have children, let’s keep this discussion environmental in nature. Let’s take an honest look at the environmental affects of population growth.
The world’s escalating population has been among my thoughts for many years.
First of all we have to realise that our dirtball planet does not have infinte resources.
Since the advent of the industrial revolution, we have adopted an attitude of dig & destroy. The more people there are on Earth the more we dig deeper and destroy more.
We have become a consumer society, the more people, the more we consume.
This is a big problem!
More than a year ago I read, link to source is long lost, that the planet has the resources to support a constant population of 500 million people.
But the population is not constant, it is ever increasingly growing, and currently stands a 7 billion.
We are exhausting planetary resources like never before; and something’s got to give.
And, it won’t be the planet, it’ll be us!
So what’s the problem?
Births – no. Mother Nature designed life that way. She knows what she’s doing.
So don’t talk about controlling the number of births.
The problem is US!
We have medicine.
That’s the problem!
Not enough people are dying.
People are living longer, longer by many years than Mother Nature intended.
Let’s go back in history a little… okay, a lot.
Stone Age man, Neanderthals, Australopithicus. They didn’t live much past 20 years. In the ensuing years we have got religion, life became sacred, we learned how to improve our lot and have extended life to 70+ years. That’s 50 more years than we were designed to live. That’s 50 more years of using the planet’s resources. Each person is using 2½ times his allotted resources.
Ancient civilisations knew that populations had to be controlled. Think of the mass sacrifices of peoples like the Maya and Aztecs. Prehistory shows us that people who didn’t contribute to the tribe were eliminated; remote Eskimos still do this, “Oops, he fell in front of a polar bear.” For how much longer? We are running out of polar bears.
In our hankering for longevity/eternal life, we have created a problem. It’s a problem that has no solution. At least not with our current technology.
This planet is too small.
We need to get off it, and go somewhere else. But that’s not feasible. Only a few selected will ever get off this planet, if ever. The problem will still be here.
Can you imagine what the Earth’s population would be if we didn’t have natural disasters, man-made disasters, famines, epidemics and the like?
The numbers become absolutely staggering.
We would have made ourselves extinct years ago. We wouldn’t be here! The planet would have already exhausted itself.
Most of you, especially those who are afflicted by religion, will find some of these ideas unpalatable, but the truth is often a bitter pill; our social conditioning makes it so. We can’t see outside the box of our upbringing. As long as this is the case there is no solution and the problem just gets worse.
Sometime ago I posted a satirically glib comment. “Legalise all drugs and let natural selection take over.” Now that sounds terrible. We are intent on saving people. Maybe we need to think about that some more.
Meanwhile, we’ll continue to dig more holes in the planet, to mine more minerals; we’ll keep pumping hot house gases into the atmosphere as we burn fossil fuels; we’ll continue to reduce the forests to create more pasture and farmland for crops; we’ll continue to pollute the waterways, we’ll continue to deplete and damage the oceans; we’ll continue to poison the land with chemicals from agriculture and fracking until there is nothing left.
I hear people shouting “become vegetarian, save the planet!” But the outcome is the same.
WE are making US extinct, a long suffering extinction.
How long before we begin to fight our neighbours for, or to protect our food and water?
The social consquences for humanity are dire. We need to think outside the box, to put practicalities first and our fragile sensibilities on the back-burner, however distasteful that may seem.
I am just glad that I won’t be here to see it. In all probability, neither will you. But what legacy are we leaving our children and our children’s children? Will there, in fact, be a legacy?
I did say that this was a stinker.
Pandora’s Box has been opened, even though historically it was an urn, and the evils of the world are afoot.
Can we ever put them back?
Meanwhile, I will continue to do my little bit in the ever frustrating hope that the planet can be saved. I’m not doing it for me, my time is nearly over; but I have raised 13 of the next generation, and they have started with seven of the next and one of them is ripe to begin the next.
I shudder to think. Will their choices be even more difficult? While I am talking about letting people die naturally which is repugnant; will they be talking about culling?
The horrors are unimaginable.