Posts Tagged ‘Japan’
14 Aug
West Coast Devastation Continues:
Seals, Oysters, Pelicans, Fish, Squid- All Sick, Dying Or Failing To Breed
Source: Running ‘Cause I Can’t Fly
Opinion:
What’s happening?
Someone knows, and they’re not telling.
To me, the answer is obvious. This is primarily happening on the west coast of North America, nowhere else on this scale.
You need to ask the question – Where did the radiocative water from Japan come?
To the west coast of North America!
To me that is a pretty big clue.
2 Apr
Change the World Wednesday – 2nd Apr
Update
The fruits of my labour…
Good News
On Saturday we gained a new little sacolão (fruit and vege store) in the neighborhood. It’s only small, but handy; and only 30 metres (32 yards) from home.
And the good thing is they don’t get their produce from CEASA, the state supplier. With CEASA you can’t guarantee the source. But they get their produce from a smallholder in Teresópolis in the north of the state. They have a choice of organic and pesticide-free veges.
And they’re not expensive.
They already know that I don’t like plastic bags and put the produce in my carry bag.
This morning when I took the photos, there was a big plastic bag of cauliflower trimmings, I asked and was able to take it to add to my compost heap. The bag… well, that will be used to put my recyclable water bottles in for the Tuesday recycle collection.
On with this weeks CTWW.
This week it’s a biggie…
THEN …
Choose one (or more) of the following activities:
- Say NO to plastic, especially plastic bottles and bags. The world’s largest “landfill” is floating in the North Pacific Ocean and consists of plastic.
- Contact your state officials and encourage them to vote against off-shore drilling.
- Walk, ride a bike, or take public transportation this week. If you must drive, drive less.
- Maintain your car and fix any leaks (oil on the pavement gets washed into storms drains and ultimately finds its way to the ocean). Never toss used oil down the drain.
- Avoid fish and seafood this week. If you must eat it, make sustainable and healthy choices (look for the Marine Stewardship Council label to ensure that it is sustainable and environmentally friendly).
- Take part in a beach clean-up.
- Eliminate the use of toxic chemicals in your home.
- Avoid the use of herbicides and pesticides.
- Scoop pet waste. Letting it sit on the lawn means that it will enter our waterways.
- Stay off the water. If you must boat, do so responsibly (don’t toss things into the water and use a human-powered boat rather than a gas-powered version).
- Dispose of all trash properly and pick up litter if you see it.
Leaves me breathless just reading it.
Part One
The plight of our oceans is disheartening. I have eluded to this in the past. Just because we can’t ‘see’ under the ocean, we seem to forget that is is just as susceptible to pollution and predation as the land.
The ocean is threatened by plastic. Obvious plastic that we can see the plastic strewn beaches, the Pacific gyre are a public disgrace; and the less obvious the micro-pellets from our washing machines that enter the water chain. The ocean also is affected by the run off of pesticides and agro-chemicals from our farmlands. Then there are stupid politicians who make assinine decisions like the Australians to dump millions of tons of waste on coral reefs like the Great Barrier Reef. The oceans are subject to warming which is changing habitats, the you have massive problems with radiation from the likes of Fukushima in Japan; already 100% of tuna caught off the American coast have levels above the acceptable limits for consumption.
The oceans aren’t safe for anyone, let alone the fish. The governments have stopped testing (American and Canadian) because the results are just too embarrassing. The latest IPCC report classifies Fukushima radiation as an ‘extinction event’. Oh, don’t get that wrong, it’s not just the fish that are affected, ALL LIFE on the planet will be affected. Cancer/radiation related deaths in babies, new borns and foetuses are already increasing on the west coast of the USA.
Now that’s just a tad more than serious.
Why isn’t this in the news? The governments don’t want you to know.
Furthermore, there are problems with over-fishing serious straining the life-cycles of marine life.
This week there was good news. Japan has been banned from it’s ‘research whaling’ (read commercial whaling in disguise) in Antarctic waters. Japan has said it will bide by the ruling, but are already looking at loopholes like reduced quotas.
So to put it in a nutshell, we have totally destroyed the planet.
Not only the visible portions, but the invisible as well.
Man’s irresponsibility is drawing us closer and closer to our own extinction.
It’s time we woke up!
It’s time we let the governments know!
It’s time we got rid of the incumbent arseholes and their pandering to the corporations.
We need to take the dog by the tail and wake the bloody thing up, because until we do, we’re f**ked!
This CTWW by Small is probably one of the most radical we face; certainly it is the most global.
We really need to educate the masses, because most of the populace is just sitting on its sanctimonious backside saying “oh, it’ll never happen!” They are lulled into complacency by the lack of news, the government’s ‘do nothing’ approach. And, worst of all the blatant bullshit of the deniers!
Well, I’ve got news for them: It is happening, here, it is happening now!
Part deux:
- While I am not perfect, there is plastic in my life, but I go out of my way to reduce it to a minimum.
- I am bound by public transport, no car; no car, less planetary resources used and wasted.
- I will not avoid fish, I consider that fish is an important dietary aspect. I do however, spurn fish like panga produced in the Asian sewer known as the Mekong River in Vietnam.
- I don’t go to the beach, but I am active and vocal in keeping our neighbourhood clean.
- I use products that are non or less toxic where possible.
- I am now shopping at the new sacolão who are supporting fruit and vege with no pesiticides and organic produce (this is a new aspect in my life).
- My pet waste is composted. The worms do a good job.
There you have it, my CTWW.
The Pacific Gyre
If you get closer, it looks like this…
Some of those plastic bottles may be yours…
Makes you proud, doesn’t it?
31 Mar
Monday Moaning
Firstly, I have no net. My ISP went down on Saturday morning. They have a problem.
Not a moan this morning, rather good news.
Japan accepts court ban on Antarctic whaling

Anti-whaling activists filmed Japanese whaling ships in January this year
The UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ruled that the Japanese government must halt its whaling programme in the Antarctic.
It agreed with Australia, which brought the case in May 2010, that the programme was not for scientific research as claimed by Tokyo.
Japan said it would abide by the decision but added it “regrets and is deeply disappointed by the decision”.
Australia argued that the programme was commercial whaling in disguise.
The court’s decision is considered legally binding.
Japan had argued that the suit brought by Australia was an attempt to impose its cultural norms on Japan.
Science ‘myth’
Reading out the judgement on Monday, Presiding Judge Peter Tomka said the court had decided, by 12 votes to four, that Japan should withdraw all permits and licenses for whaling in the Antarctic and refrain from issuing any new ones.
It said Japan had caught some 3,600 minke whales since its current programme began in 2005, but the scientific output was limited.
19 Mar
Could this be a needed change?
Japan extracts gas from methane hydrate in world first

Methane hydrate is also known as burnable or flammable ice
Japan says it has successfully extracted natural gas from frozen methane hydrate off its central coast, in a world first.
Methane hydrates, or clathrates, are a type of frozen “cage” of molecules of methane and water.
The gas field is about 50km away from Japan’s main island, in the Nankai Trough.
Researchers say it could provide an alternative energy source for Japan which imports all its energy needs.
Other countries including Canada, the US and China have been looking into ways of exploiting methane hydrate deposits as well.
Pilot experiments in recent years, using methane hydrates found under land ice, have shown that methane can be extracted from the deposits.

Methane clathrate – ‘Fire ice’
Offshore deposits present a potentially enormous source of methane but also some environmental concern, because the underwater geology containing them is unstable in many places.
“It is the world’s first offshore experiment producing gas from methane hydrate,” an official from the economy, trade and industry ministry told the AFP news agency.
A survey of the gas field is being run by state-owned Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (JOGMEC).
Engineers used a depressurisation method that turns methane hydrate into methane gas.
Production tests are expected to continue for about two weeks.
Government officials have said that they aim to establish methane hydrate production technologies for practical use within five years.
A Japanese study estimated that at least 1.1tn cubic metres of methane hydrate exist in offshore deposits.
This is the equivalent of more than a decade of Japan’s gas consumption.
Japan has few natural resources and the cost of importing fuel has increased after a backlash against nuclear power following the Fukushima nuclear disaster two years ago.
- Hydrates, or clathrates, are a frozen mixture of water and gas, primarily methane
- The methane molecules reside inside a water molecule lattice
- The methane will ignite in ice form – hence the “fire ice” moniker
- Clathrates tend to form under frigid temperatures and high pressures
- They are found in ocean sediments and under the permafrost on land
- Vast deposits are thought to exist, rivalling known reserves of traditional fossil fuels
Opinion:
Could this be the much needed drift away from nuclear and traditional fossil fuels?
11 Mar
Monday Moaning
Voters on shark conservation facing ‘undue pressure’

Several species of Hammerheads are among those under threat
Delegates at a conservation meeting in Thailand are expected to vote on proposals to extend protection to three vulnerable species of sharks.
But campaigners say undue “pressuring” of developing countries could swing Monday’s vote against the ban.
China and Japan are said to be using their trade connections to unfairly influence the outcome.
Japan denies exercising any unfair pressure, saying every delegation should vote based on their own beliefs.
An estimated 100 million sharks are killed by commercial fishing every year, researchers have recently reported.
They blame a huge appetite for shark-fin soup in China and Hong Kong for stimulating the trade.
The proposals at the Cites conservation meeting in Bangkok suggest protecting some of the most endangered species, who are highly valued for their fins.
These include the Oceanic whitetip, several species of Hammerheads and the Porbeagle shark as well as two types of manta ray which are hunted for their gill plates. These are used in some Chinese traditional medicines.
Blocking tactics
The amendments would not ban the fishing of these species, but would ensure that catches are regulated – meaning that importers and exporters would require permits.
But with support closely divided between those in favour of extending protection and those who want to keep the status quo, some campaigners claim that unfair and underhanded tactics are being used to block the proposal.
“There’s been a lot of shenanigans and pressuring of developing countries,” Dr Susan Lieberman, director of international policy at the Pew Oceanic trust told BBC News at the meeting.
“It is going to be very close,” Dr Lieberman added.
Dr Lieberman said she believed that China and Japan were responsible for placing undue pressure on nations that do not have any great interest in the shark trade, especially countries in Africa and the Middle East.
She says they are concerned that a successful shark vote could set a precedent for regulating other fish species.
“Japan is not a big player in the shark trade but it is a philosophical issue. They don’t want Cites to deal with fisheries. They just want it off the table. For China, they just don’t want to implement this. ”

A large number of countries fish for shark but most trade goes through Hong Kong
One delegate who wished to remain anonymous told BBC News that pressure from China and Japan was the “usual procedure” at these meetings.
The BBC has seen an anonymous leaflet designed to remind delegates that regulating the trade in small number of threatened shark species would be damaging.
“The livelihoods of fishermen would decline,” it says. “No conservation benefits would accrue.”
It is expected that a secret ballot will be called on the shark proposal, according to Dr Colman O’Criodain, who is attending this meeting on behalf of WWF international.
Arm twisting
He also feels that China and Japan are bringing undue pressure on developing countries in particular.
“They certainly seem to be twisting arms from the feedback we are getting. They’re saying people have approached them,” he said.
Opinion:
Fine let China use the fish from their own waters. Once they’re extinct there, don’t come looking in our waters.
Ban all exports of shark products to China.
China has to wake up and smell the coffee that their flagrant practices because it’s their traditional ‘medicine’ (which is crap anyway, just superstition) are damaging the planet for the rest of us.
Japan needs to pull its head in too. They are just adding fuel to the fire to protect their own disreputable whaling practices.
Any practice that uses only a part of an animal and discards the rest must be banned.
The world needs to seriously take a stance, you catch it, you use it… all.
Update!
The sharks win!
‘Historic’ day for shark protection

The oceanic whitetip is found in tropical and warm temperate seas
Three types of critically endangered but commercially valuable shark have been given added protection at the Cites meeting in Bangkok.
The body, which regulates trade in flora and fauna, voted by a two-thirds majority to upgrade the sharks’ status.
Campaigners hailed the move as historic and said the vote represented a major breakthrough for marine conservation.
20 Aug
Monday Moaning
Butterflies yesterday, and again today.
Has Fukushima radiation created mutant butterflies?
A butterfly study is the first to definitively link Fukushima radiation to physical mutations in any organism

Fukushima butterflies showed some abnormally-developed legs, dented eyes, deformed wing shapes, and changes to the color and spot patterns of their wings. Photograph: Alamy
Last March, the 9.0 magnitude Tōhoku earthquake triggered a tsunami that sent over 45-foot waves of water crashing down on the reactors at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant, causing the largest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. While health officials scrambled to quickly stabilize the situation, it was unclear how much radiation had made it out of the plant—and how it could affect people, plants, and animals who came into contact with it.
Preliminary studies concluded that most of the 140,000 people in the surrounding areas of Fukushima had probably been exposed to relatively low doses of radiation that probably wouldn’t lead to any adverse health effects. But a new study published last week in Nature has shown that the radiation is causing a particularly sensitive population—the pale grass blue butterfly—to develop a slew of uncommon and potentially lethal physical abnormalities.
Researchers collected butterflies immediately following the nuclear meltdown and six months later, both from the surrounding areas of Fukushima and from various other localities in Japan where the butterfly is common. As compared with the butterflies collected from elsewhere in the country, Fukushima butterflies showed some abnormally-developed legs, dented eyes, deformed wing shapes, and changes to the color and spot patterns of their wings, with an overall abnormality rate of around 12 percent.
Mutations included malformed antennae, dented eyes, bent wings, and abnormal color patterns. Photo courtesy of Joji M. OtakiMutations included malformed antennae, dented eyes, bent wings, and abnormal color patterns. Photo courtesy of Joji M. Otaki
While these levels of mutations were still relatively mild, perhaps more alarming were the same data on butterflies collected six months later, in September of last year. The overall rate of similar mutations among these butterflies was around 28 percent, while this number skyrocketed to around 52 percent in the second generation produced from the collected butterflies.
Opinion:
The world still has not been told the whole truth about Fukushima.
If the radiation has affected butterflies, it has affected all life, including humans.
Butterflies have a fast life-cycle, in humans it will take maybe one or two generations before we start to see similar results.
Meanwhile, the governments and vested interests lie through their teeth.
I read today on a blog of a woman (American) who has just returned from Japan having been there as a tourist. “Japan is beautiful.”
You couldn’t drag me screaming to Japan.
Japan is dead. It just hasn’t rolled over yet.
Remember how they likened Fukushima to Chernobyl; “Fukushima is Chernobyl on steroids!” Now does that give you an idea of the enormity of the problem?
8 Jun
Make you Fink on Friday
Green decline ‘may bring irreversible change’

Climate change threatens to make life worse in areas such as sub-Saharan Africa
With forests and fish stocks declining, water demand rising and lack of action on climate change, humanity’s path is anything but sustainable, the UN warns.
The Global Environmental Outlook says significant progress is seen on only four out of 90 environmental goals.
Meanwhile, a team of scientists warns that life on Earth may be on the way to an irreversible “tipping point”.
The UN Environment Programme (Unep) urges leaders to agree tough goals at this month’s Rio+20 summit.
Where governments have agreed specific treaties, it says, major change has transpired.
However, negotiations leading up to the summit appear mired in problems, with governments failing to find agreement since January on issues such as eliminating subsidies on fossil fuels, regulating fishing on the high seas and obliging corporations to measure their environmental footprint.
Source: BBC News Read more
We are in the final week counting down to Rio +20, that is the 1982 environmental conference twenty years on.
The United Nations conference on sustainable development.
I am not holding my breath for anything spectacular; unless you consider hot air and rhetoric as spectacular.
Everything from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which targeted this year (2012) for all nations to reduce their carbon emissions to pre-1990 levels; and what has been done?
Nothing!
The countries that were the worst offenders then, are still the worst offenders, many of whom wouldn’t sign the agreement.
I fully expect a similar result from Rio +20. Like Copenhagen was sabotaged by the Chinese, these conferences are a grand excuse for lots of talking, fancy dinners and exhibitions.
The world is in imminent danger, we are creeping closer to irreversible changes by the day and the world’s leaders make promises, then breath a sigh of relief and go home to worry about how to get elected again. If that means pushing environmental issues to the background because big money demands it, so be it.
I disagree with the use of ‘may’ in the title, ‘may’ implies a strong possibility. I would prefer to think ‘is going to’ is more appropriate, ‘is going to’ implies a high level of certainty.
Because I am certain that the irreversible changes are already here.
We no longer have a beautiful green planet.
The planet has been relegated to being a dirty mud ball.
Oh, the conference will talk about pollution, water, agriculture, food shortages, hunger, sustainability, etc. All wonderful things, but will it address such issues as Japan’s nuclear power and the ever present danger of the moment where a catastrophic collapse of the cooling towers will release enough radiation to contaminate the entire northern hemisphere.
If the northern hemisphere becomes uninhabitable, where the hell are the survivors going to go?
The southern hemisphere, of course. There isn’t enough habitable land mass in the southern hemisphere.
Just think, all of Europe, North America and much of Asia fitting into Australia, Africa and South America. Do the math, it doesn’t fit.
Stop for a moment and think of the entire northern hemisphere migrating to the south. Think of the sovereignty issues, think of the enormous refugee camps, think of the food shortages then.
Americans, the British, the French, the Israelis, the Libyans, the Mexicans, the Russians; where are you going to put a billion Chinese… all refugees clambering for space and survival.
The result:
Total chaos!
That is a high probability situation for the future given the prevalence of earthquakes in Japan that could collapse the cooling towers.
And, nobody is talking about it, neither governments, nor media, nor Japan, nor nuclear vested interests.
If you are in the northern hemisphere, and if you survive, you could reduced to refugee status.
Now, where is your house, your SUV, your high standard of living, your precious college education, your social media networks?
All gone!
5 May
Japan shuts down last reactor
All 50 reactors now closed for maintenance after 2011 tsunami but government faces major public opposition to reactivation

Operators have begun to shut down the third nuclear reactor (centre in foreground) at the Tomari plant in Japan. Photograph: AP
Japan is shutting down its last working nuclear reactor as part of the safety drive imposed after the March 2011 tsunami triggered a meltdown at the Fukushima plant.
The closure of the third reactor at the Tomari plant in Hokkaido prefecture, northern Japan, means all of the country’s 50 nuclear reactors have been taken offline, leaving the country with no nuclear-derived electricity for the first time since 1970.
Hokkaido Electric said it started lowering output from the reactor at 5pm (8am GMT). The unit should be shut down completely by the early hours of Sunday.
Hundreds of people marched through Tokyo waving banners to celebrate what they hope will be the end of nuclear power in Japan.
Source: The Guardian Read more
Opinion:
Has Japan learned its lesson?

Kansai Electric Power’s Ohi nuclear plant
“The trade minister, Yukio Edano, and three other ministers have been trying to win public backing to restart two reactors taken offline at Kansai Electric Power’s Ohi nuclear plant to help ease expected power shortages of nearly 20% in the summer.” – The Guardian
Obviously not!
In another article the statement was made, “It’s okay, we know what we are doing now!”
Sorry, you don’t!
You have no more idea of what you are doing now than when nuclear energy was first proposed.
When it comes to nuclear energy, you are playing with fire! As my mother always said, “Little boys should not play with fire!” She was right.
The whole nuclear issue is so clouded by unkowns, that moves to make the WORLD nuclear free ought to be the highest priority.
Reading the news (NOT MSM, they’re full of shit and omissions) the Fukushima disaster is much worse than we have been lead to believe.
We all remember Chernobyl, Fukushima has 85 times the amount of fuel rods. Fukushima is not safe; the tank holding spent fuel rods is so badly compromised that even a minor earthquake could topple it. They can’t fix it. To remove all the fuel rods in Fukushima (something that has NEVER been done on this scale) cannot be completed before 2014.
What happens if there is a small tremor before then? Remember that Japan is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world. The chances are extremely high.
The radioctivity from a total collapse of the cooling pool (remember this is 30 metres (90ft) in the air) is enough to annihilate Hawaii, Alaska, the western seaboards of Canada and the USA and badly contaminate the rest of the two countries, before spreading across the Atlantic Ocean to Europe.
Radiation levels in the US are already being held responsible for for an identifiable increase in deaths since the disaster.
American women pay high price for Fukushima cover-up: 35% more dead babies
Babies are dying at a 35% increased rate in eight northwest U.S. cities since the Fukushima meltdowns, evidence supporting radiation expert…
This is fact not fiction. Read the source: The Examiner
MSM, TEPCO and the governments are not telling you the full story!
4 Oct
Research… Bullshit!

This is whale research in the Philippines
Question: How many whales do you need for research?
Answer: One, maybe two, although ten is not unreasonable.
But the Japanese need 1,000!
Not just once, but every year.

This is Japanese research in the Antarctic
Why do you need to kill 1,000 whales every year in the name of research? And, where are the results of all this ‘research?’ What benefit does the planet get from all this bullshit?
This ‘research’ is a disguise for whale hunting for commercial purposes.
This is the result of Japanese research
There has been an international moratorium on whaling for 25 years, but the Japanese have a need to ignore the international community. In light of their need to know they carve up the whales to study their diet. What a load of bullshit. If you go to the doctor with problems of this nature, the doctor doesn’t carve you up, he gives you a little jar to take home to provide a stool sample for analysis. What’s wrong with whale poop? You only need whale poop to tell you about their diet; admittedly, the jar would have to be bigger.
The BBC News reports: Japan has confirmed it will go ahead with its annual whale hunt and will increase security to protect its fleet.

Yushin, owned by The Institute for Cetacean Research
Yushin is a shop and restaurant in Asakusa, Tokyo. The meat for both the shop and restaurant comes from the research factory ship Nisshin Maru which conducts the scientific whaling research slaughter in the southern ocean whale sanctuary every year.
The Telegraph reports that the shop and restaurant are closing down, supposedly for financial purposes, but it comes on top of the imminent departure of the whaling fleet, which makes one think it is more like damage control.
I was particularly interested in this paragraph from the report.
‘…a whaling industry spokesman told the Telegraph: “The purpose of Yushin was to enable more people to taste whale meat and to promote its consumption in Japan.”‘

The finger!
Bloody hell! To promote consumption! Shouldn’t the Japanese be promoting alternatives? They are just giving the finger to the rest of the world. They are not interested in finding a solution.
Norway
Of course, Japan isn’t alone in this whaling issue, Norway is in on the game too. But at least the Norwegians don’t call it research; they tell the truth.

The Norwegian Whaling quota for 2010: 1286
The Norwegian govenment’s reason for whaling:
Its an important part of the Norwegian diet and an important part of the Norwegian culture.
Then there’s this comment:
“The government is lying. I am Norwegian. From an island. I have NEVER eaten whale meat. I have never seen whale meat on the dinnertable. Not in my home, nor in anyone else’s home.”
Despite the comment above, it is recognised that whale meat has been a part of Norwegian diet for centuries with evidence of aboriginal hunting dating back to the middle ages. The Minke whale hunted by the Norwegians is plentiful and found all over the North Atlantic. All other species of whale are protected by Norway. Norwegian whaling is carried out in its own backyard and is based on the principle of protection and sustainable harvesting of marine resources.
Which is a little different from Japan’s wholesale slaughter which when you consider the annual dolphin slaughter…

Japanese Dolphin Slaughter
…makes them seem rather barbaric.
.
.
Recent Comments