Posts Tagged ‘pregnancy’

Satireday on Eco-Crap


Make you Fink on Friday

Research studies report that there are as many as  287 industrial compounds, pollutants, and other chemicals found in the umbilical cords of newborn babies.  How sad that our babies are contaminated and biologically aged before we hold them in our arms for the first time!    Here is the risk break down of the chemicals found:

-180 of these chemicals are know to cause cancer in humans

217 are toxic to the brain and nervous system

208 cause developmental problems

Is it any wonder that the cancer rate in America is 1 in every 2 males, 1 in every 3 females and that Autism is striking 1 in every 88 children?  WAKE UP!

The Presidents Cancer Panel study conducted by NIH in 2008-2009 says this:

Page 129 – In addition to exposures that directly or indirectly damage DNA, evidence suggests that some environmental agents may initiate or promote cancer by disrupting normal immune and endocrine system functions. The burgeoning number and complexity of known or suspected environmental carcinogens compel us to act to protect public health, even though we may lack irrefutable proof of harm.

Did you catch that?  Exposures that DIRECTLY and INDIRECTLY damage DNA?

Page 111 – It is vitally important to recognize that children are far more susceptible to damage from environmental carcinogens and endocrine-disrupting compounds than adults. To the extent possible, parents and child care providers should choose foods, house and garden products, play spaces, toys, medicines, and medical tests that will minimize children’s exposure to toxins.  Ideally, both mothers and fathers should avoid exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and known or suspected carcinogens prior to a child’s conception and throughout pregnancy and early life, when risk of damage is greatest.

Reblogged from: H2O Revival Read more


Our children are contaminated before they are born. What chance does the human race have?

The governments know, but they bow to the pressure of the corporations to secure funding so that they can continue to make arsehole decisions.

People, we have to get these power hungry bastards out of government.

Monday Moaning

Chemical defects ‘last generations’

Genetic changes may be passed down the generations

Scientists believe they have shown exposure to certain chemicals in the womb can cause changes that are passed through generations.

There is no firm evidence of this in humans, but Washington State University research showed a clear effect in rats.

They isolated defects linked to kidney and ovary disease and even obesity.

The work implicates a class of chemicals found in certain plastics, as well as one found in jet fuel.

The idea of “epigenetics” – that parents do not just pass their genes to their children, but subtle differences in the way those genes operate – is one of the fastest growing areas of scientific study.

The work of Dr Michael Skinner centres around the effects that certain chemicals can have on these processes, if the female is exposed at key points during pregnancy.

So far they have documented measureable effects from a host of environmental pollutants including pesticides, fungicides, dioxins and hydrocarbons.

However, they stress that the results are not directly transferable to humans yet, as the levels of chemicals used on the rats were many times more concentrated than anything a person would experience in normal life.

There is no data on even how an animal would respond at different doses, and no clues as to how the chemicals are causing these changes.

Environmental impacts

The studies, published in the journals PLoS One and Reproductive Toxicology, looked at the impact of phthalates, chemicals found in some forms of plastics, and a substance called JP8, found in jet fuel.

Rats exposed to phthalates had offspring with higher rates of kidney and prostate disease, and their great-grandchildren had more disease of the testicles, ovaries and obesity.

Female rats exposed to the hydrocarbon JP8 at the point in pregnancy when their male foetuses were developing gonads had babies with more prostate and kidney abnormalities, and their great-grandchildren had reproductive anomalies, polycystic ovary disease and obesity.

Dr Skinner said: “Your great-grandmother’s exposures during pregnancy may cause disease in you, while you had no exposure.

“This is a non-genetic form of inheritance not involving DNA sequence, but environmental impacts on DNA chemical modifications.

“This is the first study to show the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease such as obesity.”

Andreas Kortenkamp, professor of human toxicology at Brunel University, said the results were “potentially very interesting”, but much more work would need to be carried out before any impact on humans could be considered.

He said: “This is an exploratory study, but the authors themselves are clear that the data do not allow the possible risk to people to be assessed.”

“There is a currently a lack of information about the dose-response relationship, and at this stage we are very unsure about the mechanisms that are involved.”



It appears that we are all nothing but guinea pigs for industry and agriculture.

They admit they don’t know, but at the same time they can’t rule these changes out.

Every year we are being exposed to more and more harmful substances and nobody knows if they are harmful or not. When they find out, it is already too late.

With this report it maybe that we have changed the human DNA, these changes maybe irreversible, they may actually now be a part of our future. The future is here, NOW! And it doesn’t look good.


Make you Fink on Friday


Whatever you’re doing, stop and read this.

Since the Industrial Revolution we have been poisoning our environment with impunity. It is only recently that concerns have been shown; the last 30 years or so. But, we have become so entrenched in ‘progress’ and ‘money’ that many most do not want to know because it will interrupt our blasé thinking, our comfort, our the 1%’s bank balances, upset Wall Street and probably bring down governments.

The world as we know it is toxic, totally toxic. It doesn’t matter whether you are talking about arable farmland, arid deserts, cities, rain forests, the oceans, coral reefs, rivers, food, hospitals or your mother’s kitchen table.

Everything is now TOXIC!

Through our own greed we have ignored the warning signs, governments ignore any advice, corporations ignore everything turning their heads only towards profit


We, the people, are letting them do it!

Heavy metals, food additives, preservatives and colourants, residues from industry, agricultural fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides, petroleum, polluting gases and radiation have all been released into the environment in huge quantities; and the results are now becoming evident, horrifically evident.

Why have you poisoned me?

Our children do not have a chance.

Our children are exposed to these toxins before they are born, in the womb and in some cases even before conception.

Tests of umbilical cord blood show that newborns have already been exposed to more than 200 potentially hazardous chemicals in the womb.


Read this story.


Toxic chemicals finding their way into the womb

Five years ago Molly and Zachery Gray were in the midst of a dark, lonely spiral. It began with Molly’s first miscarriage.

“It was a really emotional process of being so joyful and so happy and ready to make that step into parenthood and that being pulled away from you,” said Molly, 32. “[The pregnancy is] happening and all of a sudden it’s gone. It’s really hard.”

After a second miscarriage the Grays were on a desperate hunt for answers. After Molly got pregnant a third time, she heard about a small study to test the blood of pregnant women for chemicals. She signed up.

The Grays wondered, as many do, if chemicals in the environment could be to blame. The science on this matter cannot yet give them an answer.

A growing number of studies are finding hundreds of toxic chemicals in mothers’ and, subsequently, their babies’ bodies when they are born. While there is no science yet that demonstrates conclusive cause and effect between this mix of toxic chemicals children are born with and particular health problems, a range of studies are finding associations between elevated levels of chemicals in a baby’s body and their development. Not definitive cause and effect, but associations.

Special Report: Toxic America

Despite her best efforts to avoid anything unhealthy while she was pregnant with her son, Molly’s blood tested high for mercury, a heavy metal that can cause brain damage to a developing fetus.

“It’s really scary and disheartening,” said Molly. “Somehow my son was being exposed to mercury and that’s a weight to carry because I feel like our jobs as parents is to protect them, to care for them, to nurture them and to keep them out of harm’s way.”

Scientists at the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health in New York City have been following hundreds of pregnant women over the past 12 years to measure chemicals entering the womb during pregnancy.

The women trudge through the city for 48 hours wearing special backpacks, each with a long tube that is slung over the shoulder. The tube, resting inches below the pregnant mom’s mouth, sucks air into a special filter, giving an approximate measurement of the air that she is breathing. The backpack is designed to measure ambient toxics spewed by vehicles, pesticides, and chemicals from common household products.

“It surprised me when we analyzed the air samples [from the backpacks] and found 100 percent of them had detectable levels of at least one pesticide and the air pollutants we were interested in,” said Dr. Frederica Perera, director of the CCCEH and professor at the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. “Every single one.”

The concern does not stop with mothers breathing in toxics. The CCCEH study suggests moms are passing on those toxic chemicals to their babies. So far, the toxics measured in the backpacks match what scientists are finding in the cord blood of the babies once they are born.

It is a finding that begs questions for scientists like Perera about how these chemicals might be influencing the baby – whose ability to fend off toxic chemicals is considerably less than adults – while it develops in utero.

Small studies by other groups are also finding common household chemicals in babies.

“We’ve measured hundreds and hundreds of toxic chemicals in the blood of babies that are still in the womb,” said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, a non-profit environmental advocacy organization. “Flame retardants, the chemicals in consumer products like personal care products, makeup, shampoos. It’s a very long list.”

The EWG study found an average of 232 chemicals in the cord blood of 10 babies born late last year.

They are chemicals found in a wide array of common household products — a list that is as long as it is familiar — shampoos and conditioners, cosmetics, plastics, shower curtains, mattresses, electronics like computers and cell phones, among others.

“For 80 percent of the common chemicals in everyday use in this country we know almost nothing about whether or not they can damage the brains of children, the immune system, the reproductive system, and the other developing organs,” said Dr. Phil Landrigan, a pediatrician and director of the Children’s Environmental Health Center at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. “It’s really a terrible mess we’ve gotten ourselves into.”

Landrigan demonstrated the dangers of lead

Perera and her colleagues are following the children in their study from in utero, to birth, up to their first several years of life. They recently published a study in the journal Pediatrics demonstrating an association between the chemicals they found in babies’ cord blood, and later problems on IQ tests and development.

“Fifteen percent of children [in our study] have at least one developmental problem,” said Perera.

The amount of chemicals measured in the cord blood of the babies seems to matter. The higher the concentration, the more the IQ among children seems to dip. The study is also being conducted among pregnant women in Poland and China, and finding similar results.

Molly Gray still struggles with the idea that mercury from her blood may have been passed to her baby. This concern about chemicals is something she can’t shake.

“There’s plastics, there’s mercury, there’s pesticides,” said Molly Gray, who is also a practicing midwife. “The things that we’re cleaning our homes with, the things we’re building our houses with. I think the sheer volume of the things we have to worry about is a little overwhelming.”

Even when their son Paxton, now 11 months old, was born healthy, the Grays remained vigilant. As Paxton grows and develops, they steer clear of any products with potentially toxic chemicals. Still, they worry about what is out there in the environment that they cannot control.

“Knowing that he got these chemicals from my blood it’s really scary,” said Molly Gray. “Scary that we don’t know what this means. Paxton and all of our future generations are carrying around this burden that we don’t know what it means yet. It’s the huge sea of unknown.”

While studies continue about potential health risks to children from chemicals, experts suggest ways to protect them from potential toxics, ranging from incorporating organic food into their diet, to keeping the home relatively dust-free (many toxic chemicals are conveyed in dust), to avoiding using toxic chemicals found in common household products.

Source: CNN – Toxic America by Stephanie Smith, CNN Medical Producer


Collectively we are responsible for poisoning our children, possibly before they are born. We are ALL responsible, it doesn’t matter whether you are a parent, a corporation, a government organisation supposedly protecting the people, we are all responsible.

The sheer scope of the problem makes it, in my opinion, irredeemable. I believe we are too late and will suffer the consequences. Today, tomorrow, soon, it doesn’t matter we have left an ignominious legacy for our future.

The damage has been done!

You cannot put the genie back in the bottle!


%d bloggers like this: